Home ›
Country ownership: a term whose time has gone
The term ‘country ownership’ refers to a property of the conditionality attached to programmes, processes, plans, or strategies involving both a ‘domestic’ party (generally a nation state) and a foreign party (generally the IMF, the World Bank, the Regional Development Banks, and other multilateral and bilateral institutions). Under what circumstances and how can the concept of country ownership be relevant to a country with a myriad heterogeneous and often conflicting views and interests? Or to a country whose government’s representational legitimacy or democratic credentials are in question? The author argues that the term has been abused to such an extent that it is at best unhelpful and at worst pernicious: a term whose time has gone.
Author:
Issue
Guided search
Click a term to initiate a search.
Content type
- Abstract (1433)
- Book review (603)
- Book (20)
Keywords
- Aid (493)
- Civil society (621)
- Conflict and reconstruction (174)
- Environment (164)
- Gender and diversity (394)
- Globalisation (165)
- Governance and public policy (418)
- Labour and livelihoods (318)
- Methods (460)
- Rights (295)
- Social sector (259)
- Technology (81)
Regions
- Arab States (28)
- Middle East (4)
- Oceania and Japan (31)
- Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS (32)
- East Asia (96)
- Latin America and the Caribbean (204)
- North America (35)
- South Asia (202)
- South East Asia (17)
- Sub-Saharan Africa (354)
- Western and Southern Europe (45)