Home ›
Microcredit and microfinance: functional and conceptual differences
The interchangeable use of the terms microcredit and microfinance creates serious confusions and misunderstandings in both academic and policy discourses. Microcredit programmes provide mainly one kind of service, namely loan distribution and collection, while microfinance programmes provide several financial and organisational services including credit, savings, insurance, and community development. From the functional perspective, differences appear more semantic than substantive. However, the conceptual differences are fundamental because they involve both the underlying motives and the ways in which the two types of venture operate in practice. Microcredit is essentially a non-profit approach to development and depends on external support, while microfinance programmes seek to return enough profit to be self-financing. Thus, the two programs need to be treated separately in relation to their role in the alleviation of Third World poverty.
Issue
Guided search
Click a term to initiate a search.
Content type
- Abstract (1433)
- Book review (603)
- Book (20)
Keywords
- Aid (493)
- Civil society (621)
- Conflict and reconstruction (174)
- Environment (164)
- Gender and diversity (394)
- Globalisation (165)
- Governance and public policy (418)
- Labour and livelihoods (318)
- Methods (460)
- Rights (295)
- Social sector (259)
- Technology (81)
Regions
- Arab States (28)
- Middle East (4)
- Oceania and Japan (31)
- Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS (32)
- East Asia (96)
- Latin America and the Caribbean (204)
- North America (35)
- South Asia (202)
- South East Asia (17)
- Sub-Saharan Africa (354)
- Western and Southern Europe (45)